These are working arguments, not finished doctrine. I am interested in the distance between what a business already knows, what management can actually see, and what someone can still do before the result becomes unavoidable.
Every piece includes the strongest case I can make against my own position. If an idea cannot survive that, it is not useful yet.
The business usually produces evidence before the financial result appears. The failure is that the right person does not see the evidence while there is still time to act.
Read the piece →We became extraordinarily good at collecting what happened. We remained surprisingly dependent on people to notice, interpret, coordinate, and act.
Read the piece →A useful system does not end with insight. It connects observation to accountable action, then measures whether the intervention actually worked.
Read the piece →Nothing here is valuable because it contains the words artificial intelligence. It is valuable only if it helps somebody see reality sooner, make a better decision, or learn faster from the result.